[vc_row type = ”in_container” Full_Screen_row_Position = "Middle" cenário_position = "Center" text_color = "Dark" text_align = "esquerda" Sobreagem_strength = "0.3 ″ Shape_Divider_Position =" Bottom "] [VC_Column column_padding_position = "all" background_color_opacity = "1 ″ background_hover_color_opacity =" 1 ″ column_shadow = "none" column_border_radius = "into" width = "2/3 ″ tablet_text_alignment =" default "/telefone_tht_tht_tht =" 2/3 ″ Tablet_text_alignment = "default"/telefone_tht_tht_Text = "2/3 ″ Tablet_text_alignment =" default "/telefon_tx_Text =" 2/3 ″ tablet_text_alignment = "default". column_border_style = "sólido"] [vc_column_text] Não estamos apenas nos preparando para o final do ano, mas o final de uma década. Uma década que viu um declínio rápido e triste do que foi, uma vez, um partido político orgulhoso e sério. da autoconsciência seria a ordem do dia para Jeremy Corbyn e o grupo de acólitos equivocados com quem ele se cercou desde que se tornou um líder improvável em 2015.
Since 2010 Labour has gone on a perpetual journey of self-harm, lurching from one crisis to another, electing the wrong leaders and adopting policies for the fairies.
Following its trouncing and humiliation at the General Election last week, you might expect that a period of mature reflection and a dose of self-awareness would be the order of the day for Jeremy Corbyn and the group of misguided acolytes who he has surrounded himself with since he became an unlikely leader back in 2015.
However, the delusion that led them to creating a Manifesto that offered everything other than a complimentary Unicorn in your back garden for Christmas has continued as they look to deflect blame from themselves and their shambolic management of the party over the past two years onto the shoulders of others.
The media, Brexit and the failure of some MPs to fully get behind St Jeremy have all been cited as the reasons for Labour’s worst election result since 1935.
What a load of baloney!
The media, even during the halcyon days of Labour’s most successful leader Tony Blair, were never on Labour’s side, as we have been reminded by the posting of many headlines and images from the press from the New Labour period over the past week. In addition, it must be conceded even by the most ardent of delusional Corbynites that the mainstream media have less influence now than ever before, given the explosion of social media platforms.
In terms of party splits, can anyone seriously argue that Corbyn has had to endure worse internal divisions that have been very publicly aired from the Conservative Party? Not only did Boris Johnson expel more than twenty high-profile Tory MPs just prior to the election, but he had a previous Conservative prime minister and a large number of Tory Grandees actively campaigning against him.
In terms of Brexit, the challenge for Labour in the election wasn’t the issue but its muddled position – a compromise forced on the leadership by Trades Union leaders – and Corbyn’s bizarre decision to announce that he would stay ‘neutral’ during any second EU referendum.
O trabalho de trabalho está agora em uma encruzilhada. Ele pode retornar à sanidade ou continuar com sua parte esquerda e se tornar um grupo de pressão e não um partido político.
The suggestion that a leadership ticket of Rebecca Long Bailey and Richard Burgon is anything other than a free pass for another five years for the Tories is naïve and negligent.
Em termos daqueles que organizaram a campanha, uma seleção de trots descontentes, políticos de gestos de classe média e outliers de extrema esquerda, eles devem ser removidos da hierarquia do partido na primeira oportunidade possível - envie -os de volta à política dos estudantes onde pertencem. Um retorno ao novo trabalho? Absolutamente não. Assim como era loucura lutar em uma plataforma de políticas dos anos 1970 para vencer uma eleição em 2019, seria igualmente tolice adotar uma agenda do final do século XX para uma campanha do século XXI. sofrido é que o país estava pronto para apoiar um tipo diferente de política. Um programa pragmático e realista de ala esquerda teria ganhado apoio, se ele tivesse sido liderado por um líder credível. Espero que Lisa Nandy, minha escolha preferida nesta fase, comece a desenvolver uma narrativa mais sofisticada do que simplesmente dizer que o trabalho precisa de uma voz do norte para liderar o partido para vencer novamente. É muito mais desafiador do que isso.
So, what should come next? A return to New Labour? Absolutely not. Just as it was madness to fight on a platform of 1970s policies to win an election in 2019, it would be equally foolish to adopt a late twentieth century agenda for a twenty-first century campaign.
A more socially responsible approach to business, the environment, investment and economic growth is not only the right thing to argue for, but in the right context popular too.
The irony of what Labour has just suffered is that the country was ready to support a different type of politics. A pragmatic, realistic left wing programme would have won support, particularly had it been fronted by a credible leader.
Up to now, only Keir Starmer has begun to address some of the key issues that Labour must resolve if they are to win back people’s trust and credibility. I hope that Lisa Nandy, my preferred choice at this stage, begins to develop a more sophisticated narrative than simply saying Labour needs a northern voice to lead the party to win again. Its much more challenging than that.
, mas uma coisa é certa. Se o trabalho quiser sobreviver nos próximos dez anos, não importa prosperar durante a nova década, ele deve abandonar o que foi um experimento desastroso com política de fantasia. Antecedentes_hover_color_opacity = ”1 ″ column_shadow =” None ”colun_border_radius =” None ”width =” 1/3 ″ tablet_text_alignment = ”padrão” Phone_Text_alignment = ”default” column_border_width = ”None” column_border_style = "sólido"] [vc_raw_html] jtndySuymghyzwylm0qlmjjodhrwcyuzqsuyriuyrnr3ax R0zxIUy29TJTJGRG93BNRVD25GCMFUAYUZRNJLZl9ZCMLM0R0D3NYYYUTVFGZ3JTIYJTIWY2XHC3MLM0QLMJ J0D2L0DGVYLWZVBGXVDY1IDXR0B24LMJILMJBKYXRHLXNOB3CTY291BNQLM0QLMJJMYWXZZZSUYMIUZRUZVBGXVDY Uymcu0mervd250b3durnjhbmslm0mlmkzhjtnfjtndc2nyaxb0jtiwyxn5bmmlmjbzcmmlm0qlmjjodhrwcyUzqs Uyriuyrnbsyxrmb3jtlnr3axr0zxiUy29tjtjgd2lkz2v0cy5qcyuymiuymgnoyxjzzxqlm0qlmjj1dgytocuymi UzrsUzqyuyrnnjcmlwdcuzrq == [/vc_raw_html] [vc_raw_html] jtndySUymgSyxnzjtnejtiydhdpdhrlci1 0aw1lbGluzSUymiuyMgrHDGETAGVPZ2H0JTNEJTIMYTAWMCUYMIUYMGHYZWYLM0QLMJJODHRWCYUZQSUYRIUYRNR 3axr0ZXIUY29TJTJGRG93BNRVD25GCMFUAYUZRNJLZl9ZCMLM0R0D3NYYYUTVFDGZ3JTIYJTNFVHDLZXRZJTI wynklmjbeb3dudg93bkzyyw5rjtndjtjgysUzrsuymcUzq3njcmlwdcuymgfzew5jjtiwc3jjjtnejtiyahr0chm lm0elmkylmkzwbgf0zm9ybs50d2l0dgvylmnvbsuyrndpzgdldhmuanmlmjilmjbjagfyc2v0jtnejtiydxrmltg lmjilm0ulm0mlmkzzy3jpchqlm0ulmja = [/vc_raw_html] [vc_raw_html] jtndysUymghyzwylm0qlmjjodhrw cyuzqsuyriuyrnr3axr0zxiuy29tjtjgrg93bnrvd25gcmfuayUzrnjlzl9zCmmlm0r0d3nyyuyntvfdgz3Jtiy Jtiwy2xhc3mlm0qlmjj0d2l0dgvylwzvbgxvdy1idxr0b24lmjilmjbkyxrhlxnob3cty291bnqlm0qlmjjmywxz ZSUYMIUZRUZVBGXVDYUYMCU0MERVD250B3DURNJHBMSLM0MLMKZHJTNFJTNDC2NYAXB0JTIWYXN5BMMLMJBZCMML M0qlmjjodhrwcyuzqsuyriuyrnbsyxrmb3jtlnr3axr0zxiuy29tjtjgd2lkz2v0cy5qcyuymiuymgnoyxjzzxxql M0qlmjj1dgytocUymiuzrsuzqyuyrnnjcmlwdcuzrq == [/vc_raw_html] [/vc_column] [/vc_row]
