Por que o topo do ingresso presidencial republicano é obcecado por animais domésticos? Padrões, era irregular, o candidato do Partido Republicano também alegou que os democratas na América têm ambições de "executar" bebês. Comandante em chefe dos Estados Unidos. Hoje em dia é o discurso da política americana, o apoio a Trump está tão arraigado com seus apoiadores que-como ele disse-ele poderia sair para a rua e atirar em alguém, e ainda ganhar seus votos. O debate na TV de mãos dadas - mas é improvável que tenha mudado o mostrador muito no concurso mais polarizado na história da corrida presidencial. Mas mesmo a princesa do pop não resistiu às referências de animais de estimação, assinando seu post de apoio à mídia social de apoio "Mulher de Cat sem filhos".
Vice Presidential hopeful JD Vance has a problem with female cat owners – whilst his boss and former President Donald Trump has convinced himself – if nobody else – that the poor people of Springfield USA are having their dogs and cats kidnapped and eaten by immigrants.
In a performance that, even by Trump’s standards, was erratic, the GOP nominee also claimed that Democrats in America have ambitions to “execute” babies.
A 90-minute TV debate, the first and possibly only head-to-head dual between Vice President Kamala Harris and ‘The Don’, saw the pair trade blows – but it would be fair to say that the TV reality star hardly laid a glove on his Democrat opponent, who hopes to become the first female Commander-in-Chief of the United States.
If Joe Biden’s confused ramblings back in the June debate with Trump were enough to see the 81-year-old President drop out of the race, then surely 78-year-old Trumps scowling, car crash utterances will result in a landslide victory for VP Harris when the Yanks go to the polls on 5th November?
Sadly, that is not the case. Such is the discourse of American politics nowadays, support for Trump is so entrenched with his supporters that – as he said himself – he could go out into the street and shoot somebody, and still win their votes.
Indeed, in a post-debate Sky News Vox pop, a man described Trump as “deranged” – before pledging his vote to the Republican!
In the end Harris may have won the TV debate hands down – but it is unlikely to have shifted the dial much in arguably the most polarised contest in Presidential – race history.
More influential than the debate – and probably better news for Kamala Harris – was the endorsement of the Democrat’s Harris/Walz ticket immediately after the TV showdown by Taylor Swift. But even the Princess of Pop couldn’t resist the pet references, signing off her supportive social media post ‘Childless Cat Woman’.
Tenho certeza de que os democratas ronronam de prazer, enquanto o time de Trump estará louco, não apenas na intervenção dos Swifties, mas pela performance de televisão fora de mentalidade e fora do homem. Downtown in Business
